This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-09-19
Channels
- # bangalore-clj (35)
- # beginners (42)
- # boot (89)
- # cider (9)
- # clara (2)
- # cljs-dev (29)
- # cljsjs (3)
- # cljsrn (14)
- # clojars (9)
- # clojure (332)
- # clojure-brasil (1)
- # clojure-dev (5)
- # clojure-italy (4)
- # clojure-russia (36)
- # clojure-spec (38)
- # clojure-uk (65)
- # clojurescript (114)
- # clr (11)
- # community-development (105)
- # core-async (10)
- # cursive (4)
- # datascript (1)
- # datomic (58)
- # defnpodcast (3)
- # emacs (4)
- # hoplon (7)
- # juxt (3)
- # keechma (8)
- # off-topic (7)
- # om (109)
- # om-next (8)
- # onyx (26)
- # pedestal (3)
- # planck (8)
- # re-frame (76)
- # reagent (28)
- # rum (25)
- # spacemacs (2)
- # specter (35)
- # untangled (31)
- # yada (27)
@cfleming, yes in that case it was a local binding from a let. I think it simply moved through each parent scope until all symbols in the expression could be resolved. It never has to go beyond the top-level form since from there things are namespace global. This really eliminates a lot of pain writing print statements within let
s or going to the end of the let
an rewriting it to return the binding’s result.
@cfleming I know you have a whole lot on your plate, but this seem like an easy feature. But in terms of dev experience I think it would be worth gold.