This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-08-17
Channels
- # admin-announcements (1)
- # aleph (1)
- # architecture (1)
- # bangalore-clj (14)
- # beginners (15)
- # boot (89)
- # braveandtrue (1)
- # cider (1)
- # cljs-dev (33)
- # cljsjs (1)
- # cljsrn (147)
- # clojure (149)
- # clojure-quebec (1)
- # clojure-russia (82)
- # clojure-spec (18)
- # clojure-taiwan (2)
- # clojure-uk (15)
- # clojurescript (97)
- # cursive (11)
- # datomic (22)
- # funcool (2)
- # hoplon (53)
- # immutant (16)
- # jobs-rus (8)
- # lambdaisland (1)
- # off-topic (13)
- # om (7)
- # onyx (58)
- # parinfer (6)
- # planck (19)
- # protorepl (2)
- # re-frame (17)
- # reagent (201)
- # rum (6)
- # specter (9)
- # test-check (68)
- # untangled (47)
- # yada (94)
@sandbags: That’s to prevent people from accidentally sending code to the wrong REPL, which happened a lot.
In this snippet of code:
What’s the paraedit way of pushing the let inside the function definition?
@pupeno: I don’t think there’s a good way to do that, unfortunately. I’d kill the fn [data]
, raise the (assoc-in…
and then wrap the whole thing and paste the fn [data]
again. Not very elegant. Paredit proper has transpose-sexp
which I think does that, but I couldn’t find any useful examples online of how it should work.
Just generated some stubs.... Unsuccessfully. Gave me a few errors at first, which I fixed. Eventually only gave me warnings and the window "note" (at the top) for generating stubs disappeared. But it seems to not do any "Quick Doc" for Datomic. Do I have to do anything else?
@rauh: You shouldn’t, no. Could you try closing and opening your project? I’ve seen a couple of issues where IJ doesn’t pick up new stubs.