Fork me on GitHub
#cursive
<
2015-12-02
>
cfleming00:12:14

@roelof: That bug is fixed in the next release.

Pablo Fernandez00:12:03

cfleming: using screenflow. I’m really liking it. Much better for my workflow than quicktime/imove/final cut pro

cfleming00:12:37

Yeah, I see a lot of people recommending it

cfleming00:12:15

Nice, I’ll take a look

Pablo Fernandez00:12:42

The tour of Ninja Tools will be officially published tomorrow in our web site (https://carouselapps.com)

cfleming00:12:04

That looks really interesting, I’ll try to make some time to watch it.

balduncle01:12:00

@cfleming: if I’m attempting to start my own company and I’m the only one in the company is it acceptable to purchase an individual license or should I go with commercial?

cfleming01:12:49

@balduncle: An individual one is ok in those circumstances, as long as it’s not the company paying for it. Often people buy licences for IntelliJ and the like when they’re the only one in their office using it - that’s fine as long as the company doesn’t pay.

cfleming01:12:02

Obviously if the company is just you, it’s kind of moot whose money it is simple_smile

balduncle01:12:31

simple_smile Okay. Thanks.

danielcompton03:12:31

@cfleming: Jetbrains have the same policy, is that actually enforceable, or is that just what they’d prefer you to do?

cfleming03:12:26

@danielcompton: Well, for some value of enforceable - it’s violating the terms of the EULA if you don’t do that.

cfleming03:12:37

Which legally means you can’t use the software.

cfleming03:12:59

But there’s no technical means to validate compliance, no.

danielcompton03:12:48

sure, I wondered if you could put those kinds of terms in a EULA

danielcompton03:12:58

I guess you can put whatever you like in there

cfleming03:12:07

Yup, they have it in theirs and I’ve put it in mine.

cfleming03:12:35

Yeah, whether it’s legally enforceable in all jurisdictions is another matter.

cfleming03:12:53

But my approach is basically “please don’t do that”.

danielcompton03:12:01

is there a copy of the cursive license somewhere?

cfleming03:12:30

Not yet, there will be when the 1.0 is out. It’s getting a final review right now.

roelof06:12:49

@cfleming: thanks, any idea when the next release will be ?

cfleming07:12:14

@roelof: Probably Friday. In the meantime, the workaround would be to create the project on the command line and import it.

roelof08:12:59

oke, no problem, This project do not have a dead-line so I can wait

roelof08:12:21

Then I could spend more time with 4clojure and the brave book

squest14:12:16

@cfleming: Hi Colin, I’ve been thinking about what you said last night re: setup and tear-down the environment in each ns, I think that’s the way I should go… so I think I will refactor my tests around this idea. It’s much better way anyway, since this way things will be simpler and much easier to simulate only certain parts of the app.

squest14:12:55

Thanks for the idea

jaen15:12:41

Is not being able to set breakpoints inside protocol methods a limitation the can be lifted in the future, or?

timgilbert15:12:57

I've been trying out https://shaunlebron.github.io/parinfer/ in Atom and I really like it. Any chance this could be implemented for Cursive (by @cfleming or somebody else)?

ericstewart15:12:58

@timgilbert: I see that there is a ticket already for parinfer functionality and some discussion there: https://github.com/cursiveclojure/cursive/issues/1155

timgilbert16:12:53

Oh, cool. Didn't realize there was a github tracker for Clojure. Thanks!