hello, does anyone has explanation why in this koan https://github.com/functional-koans/clojure-koans/blob/master/src/koans/23_meta.clj . Cursive says that Giant cannot be resolved in line 13

that looks like a typo to me and it should be lower-case giants

I do not think so. if I do that part in a lein repl I see a answer

well, I guess it depends on the intent of the koans writer in this case. hard for me to say for sure.

I tried other ide like lightable and that one has no problems with it

I think the reason you are probably seeing different things is because meditations is a macro that is delaying evaluation and that will confuse some editor environments

that can be

the "Giants" in that line is a symbol, which you notice is quoted in line 5

I know Light table says my solution is wrong where a lein repl says it true

what was your solution?

yep, that is quoted in line 5 is correct

my solution is this one : (= {:division "West"} (meta '^{:division "West"} Giants))

lein repl says then true

I certainly think that is the intent of the koan :)

but till now no ide can handle it right 😞

LT says this is false and Cursive cannot resolve the Giant part

he, when I quote the Giants part , I can do run -> run and see no error message

only also no messages from the unsolved koans

I think it's confusing at a glance why this works - the reader macro ^{:division "West"} is being applied to the symbol after it Giants and then quoting (prior to that whole thing) is being applied to avoid evaluation of Giants, which is an undefined symbol

I suspect Cursive is seeing the (undefined) symbol without properly accounting for the context of the quote prior to the reader macro somehow

not sure about LT

@roelof: understanding macros is hard, so Cursive can't understand any and all macro. Did you try just evaluating even though Cursive says it can't resolve the symbol? It's just a warning that Curisve can't find it in the index (because it can't understand any and all macro), but I think you can run it anyway if you know it's correct.

oke

with the same trick LT has still problems

Thanks all