@mikera: any thoughts on allowing core.matrix to be called from java?

Hmmmm when using Java I just use Vectorz directly

It has all the core.matrix features and you get the added benefits of type safety and faster dispatch

the thought was to take advantage of the multiple implementations

it might not be worth the effort of getting everything to work in java though...

Well... you can always use the usual Java -> Clojure API

yeah, i’m currently in germany with a bunch of image processing folks and we’re debating on migrating to a new matrix library

since there isn’t a clear winner across the board when it comes to decompositions and solving, i’m suggesting that there might be some value in being able to swap implementations

(java image processing folks)

it doesn’t seem like you’ve gotten Vectorz into the running on http://lessthanoptimal.github.io/Java-Matrix-Benchmark/runtime/2015_07_XeonQuad/

though, since you said you based it on EJML, i’m guessing the performance is relatively similar