This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2023-10-25
Channels
- # announcements (22)
- # babashka (9)
- # beginners (33)
- # biff (12)
- # calva (17)
- # cider (64)
- # cljdoc (3)
- # cljfx (16)
- # clojure (125)
- # clojure-bay-area (14)
- # clojure-europe (15)
- # clojure-norway (64)
- # clojure-uk (2)
- # clojurescript (7)
- # conjure (1)
- # core-async (4)
- # cursive (6)
- # data-science (14)
- # datahike (8)
- # datomic (6)
- # defnpodcast (4)
- # emacs (5)
- # events (1)
- # hyperfiddle (15)
- # leiningen (17)
- # lsp (8)
- # membrane (27)
- # off-topic (25)
- # podcasts-discuss (4)
- # polylith (6)
- # portal (21)
- # reagent (11)
- # releases (1)
- # shadow-cljs (36)
- # slack-help (2)
- # sql (1)
- # squint (131)
- # testing (12)
- # xtdb (7)
I'd like to ask you all to upvote fixing https://ask.clojure.org/index.php/348/clarify-timeout-mention-close-should-called-timeout-channel which caused us tremendous pain over the past few days. Thanks!
according to the JIRA ticket, it seems that there is a preference to make close!
on a timeout channel an exception rather than simply adding documentation warning against doing this
Yeah that patch might be a good solution but it also comes with some drawbacks. See https://clojure.atlassian.net/browse/ASYNC-250 for a deeper exploration of the issue.