anybody have experience using core.async with prismatic’s schema?

looking for the proper way to refer to a channel as an argument to a function

settled on (schema/protocol Channel) for now, but wondering if there’s anything more idiomatic that people are doing

@mss That's what we do as well.

by we I mean myself and my place of work.

cool good to know. really appreciate the feedback

I’m currently using a Schema for each message that consists of a Type, Header, Payload, and Metadata.

This I way I can write a central supervisor (read recent blogs by @angusiguess) that can observe and act upon the messages received.

If anyone is working on “shaping” the async message channels, happy to learn.