This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-01-26
Channels
- # announcements (5)
- # architecture (79)
- # babashka (48)
- # beginners (148)
- # calva (57)
- # cider (31)
- # clara (2)
- # clj-kondo (4)
- # cljs-dev (6)
- # cljsrn (1)
- # clojure (10)
- # clojure-australia (4)
- # clojure-dev (5)
- # clojure-europe (13)
- # clojure-france (1)
- # clojure-nl (6)
- # clojure-provo (4)
- # clojure-uk (51)
- # clojurescript (38)
- # conjure (20)
- # core-logic (18)
- # cursive (28)
- # datomic (12)
- # duct (2)
- # emacs (16)
- # figwheel-main (3)
- # fulcro (43)
- # honeysql (17)
- # hoplon (3)
- # jobs (1)
- # meander (4)
- # mount (5)
- # off-topic (32)
- # pathom (6)
- # pedestal (5)
- # re-frame (1)
- # reagent (2)
- # reveal (8)
- # shadow-cljs (209)
- # spacemacs (5)
- # tools-deps (37)
- # xtdb (18)
There is something missing for the eval form and that's eval current word and store comment
So, if I have something like this (def x-token (authenticate app-config))
then I would normally do ,ew
over x-token
to get it's value. It would be nice if I could do ,ewc
to store that like a comment too
If I add this it's only a matter of time before someone asks for "eval root form and comment" too. So I went down the simple option of "only current form" for this implementation so far, but I've done the hard part (adding comments in the correct way).
To do this style, I think I need to rewrite / redeisgn the comment result thing system. So it'll be a prefix to any mapping :thinking_face:
Also practicalli mentioned wanting ;;
over ;
, but I think that'll be a setting with ;
being the default for internal implementation reasons in Conjure.