This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-01-21
Channels
- # announcements (4)
- # aws (29)
- # aws-lambda (1)
- # babashka (21)
- # beginners (143)
- # calva (47)
- # cider (31)
- # clj-kondo (24)
- # cljsrn (4)
- # clojure (70)
- # clojure-australia (3)
- # clojure-czech (1)
- # clojure-europe (97)
- # clojure-greece (4)
- # clojure-nl (3)
- # clojure-uk (45)
- # clojurescript (70)
- # code-reviews (1)
- # conjure (7)
- # cursive (10)
- # datomic (13)
- # duct (5)
- # emacs (1)
- # fulcro (38)
- # graalvm (1)
- # graphql (9)
- # honeysql (13)
- # integrant (33)
- # jobs (14)
- # jobs-rus (1)
- # malli (7)
- # off-topic (72)
- # pathom (1)
- # re-frame (11)
- # reitit (9)
- # remote-jobs (2)
- # sci (11)
- # shadow-cljs (9)
- # sql (5)
- # tools-deps (5)
- # xtdb (6)
So, until this issue has had some thought
, I'm wrapping the inner sections of my (comment..)
blocks with a (do....)
. Anyone got any other strategies?
👀 3
I thought #132 is the problem where I have something like (comment (+ 1 1))
and I press ,er
inside the (+ 1 1)
form, which currently just evals the (comment …)
and returns nil
.
Oh, I think I see. I thought the idea #132 was to stop the “eval root” just before the comment. I think what you folks are suggesting is that “eval root” should eval the whole comment as a do
, so wrapping the content in a do
and doing ,ee
in the do
is a workaround. Do I have that right?