There's a cider operation for redirecting that output

I hope everyone's having an nice weekend 🙂 got a coffee ☕ going to work on ConjureSchool a little.

I've pushed the first pass of :ConjureSchool if anyone wants to give it a go 😄 (on develop)

A workflow question: So, up until now, I had a repl running and my vim and I've sent code from my vim to my repl (which was running in a terminal in another app). Is that flow still "encouraged" in Conjure? I mean, the log buffer show a lot of stuff, but if I just want to write some current repl session code and experiment a bit, do I do it inside vim or in the terminal repl? t If inside vim, can I do it without "dirtying" up the working buffer/file with code in comments and stuff like that?

Just starting to look at ConjureSchool - but interrupted for dinner

Grab yourself a nice beverage and get evaluating. I hope you enjoy!

I would suggest a more passive voice

Grab yourself a nice beverage and let's get evaluating. I hope you enjoy!

Ah thanks! I prefer that, I'll tweak it soon

Okay, also this:

;; This language is Fennel, it's quite similar to Clojure.
;; Let's learn how to evaluate it using Conjure's assortment of mappings.
;; You can learn how to change these mappings with :help conjure-mappings

I don't quite get it. You don't explain why fennel is the language to use here

You simply say "This language is Fennel", and yes although it's similar to Clojure, why is being used here?

Ah fair point, I shied away from it since I thought it'd be too much detail when you're only really there to learn the mappings

Tried to keep it as simple as possible, it'll get too wordy otherwise. I can add a little explanation though

Just a sentence about why we're doing Fennel

All results are appended to the log buffer, when you don't have the log open the HUD will appear. perhaps All results are appended to a log buffer. If that log is not open, the HUD will appear

You introduce the log buffer, without first presenting it.

I was wondering All results are appened to the log buffer -- I was thinking Where is this log buffer? I don't see it - is that thing that popped up it?

it's the use of the the

Try opening and closing the log window to get the hang of it now. -> Try opening and closing the log window to get the hang of those key bindings

(btw, all I'm saying are simply suggestions, you are free of course to accept, reject, modify as you see fit, being the author! 🙂 )

Won't hurt my feelings 🙂

Feel free to leave it open in a split for the next lesson to see how it behaves. -> Feel free to leave it open in a split for the next lesson to see how the log behaves.

or Feel free to leave the log open in a split for the next lesson to see how it behaves.

It's good to reinforce the the subject in the sentence.

Awesome! You evaluated the form under your cursor. -> Awesome! You evaluated the inner form under your cursor.

This line you introduce outermost evaluation ;; If we want to evaluate the outermost form under our cursor, we can use <localleader>er instead.

When it's evaluated you say ;; You evaluated the root form! Nice!

I would keep it consistent - either say root form in both sentences, or outermost form

;; We can also evaluate a form and replace it with the result of the evaluation with <localleader>e!
;; Try that in the next lesson below.
(school.lesson-4)

->

;; We can also evaluate a form and replace it with the result of the evaluation with <localleader>e!
;; We'll try that in the next lesson below by place your cursor inside the form below and issuing <localleader>e!
(school.lesson-4)

(not completely sure about that one...)

Shouldn't this ;; Now move your cursor elsewhere in the buffer and use <localleader>em to evaluate it. be ;; Now move your cursor elsewhere in the buffer and use <localleader>emf to evaluate it.?

(where f was the mark that was placed?)

That's all for now 🙂

bbl

.

How do people debug their code in conjure?