This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-09-16
Channels
- # announcements (19)
- # babashka (13)
- # beginners (7)
- # calva (8)
- # cider (25)
- # clj-kondo (12)
- # cljsrn (7)
- # clojure (60)
- # clojure-australia (5)
- # clojure-europe (59)
- # clojure-france (14)
- # clojure-gamedev (2)
- # clojure-nl (1)
- # clojure-uk (7)
- # clojurescript (43)
- # community-development (8)
- # core-async (2)
- # cursive (15)
- # datomic (75)
- # deps-new (31)
- # depstar (1)
- # fulcro (6)
- # graalvm (53)
- # holy-lambda (1)
- # juxt (3)
- # jvm (13)
- # kaocha (8)
- # lsp (109)
- # malli (14)
- # off-topic (62)
- # pathom (11)
- # pedestal (12)
- # polylith (12)
- # releases (5)
- # sci (5)
- # shadow-cljs (15)
- # sql (16)
- # tools-deps (27)
- # vim (1)
- # xtdb (14)
Meta note: we should probably use threads when responding to posts about potential spammers, so we don't "spam" the main channel, and we should probably delete the OP that quoted the spam message itself so the spam is no longer visible (and no longer archived to the Clojurians log and Zulip). And, yes, I'm guilty of both "offences" here and will try to do better in the future...
@U0545PBND Like this, a Slack thread.
Right. So someone reports spam in here. Any replies should be replied in a thread. When the spam has been removed, the report is also removed and as such all the replies as well?
Slight correction... Deleting the post reporting the spam would delete any references to it, allowing for it to be completely deleted and thus not showing up in any of the logging bots we have running?
Right, deleting the OP removes it from Zulip and the ClojureVerse log. The replies in the thread remain, until an Admin also deletes those.