This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2019-02-11
Channels
- # adventofcode (8)
- # announcements (1)
- # arachne (23)
- # beginners (146)
- # boot (4)
- # calva (2)
- # cider (48)
- # cljs-dev (17)
- # clojure (214)
- # clojure-austin (2)
- # clojure-berlin (1)
- # clojure-europe (9)
- # clojure-italy (5)
- # clojure-nl (2)
- # clojure-sanfrancisco (2)
- # clojure-spec (124)
- # clojure-uk (67)
- # clojured (3)
- # clojurescript (95)
- # community-development (7)
- # cursive (68)
- # data-science (1)
- # datomic (80)
- # emacs (19)
- # figwheel (3)
- # figwheel-main (5)
- # fulcro (61)
- # javascript (2)
- # kaocha (1)
- # off-topic (25)
- # pathom (21)
- # pedestal (1)
- # perun (4)
- # reitit (11)
- # ring-swagger (2)
- # shadow-cljs (55)
- # spacemacs (4)
- # sql (8)
- # test-check (16)
- # tools-deps (2)
- # vim (13)
- # yada (4)
This might be tangental to this channel but could a separate survey be created to put into a general programming community (like r/programming or r/functionalprogramming) to get their input on Clojure? While I understand the inherent value in collecting feedback from people already using Clojure, a much larger number of people are not using Clojure which makes me curious about their take on the language and community.
This made a lot of sense at 2am and now, ~18 hours later it makes 0 sense. The number of answers you may get vs the value in the feedback would be so low that it is completely non-viable and would likely be far move valuable to the core team NOT to spend time on this.
is ClojureVerse missing from that list?
seems to be missing a link to https://clojurians-log.clojureverse.org/ too?
ClojureVerse is linked from r/Clojure but wasn't mentioned in that comment from the survey (and I was only writing about interactive chat clients).
I didn't mention the clojurians-log because Daniel already highlighted that in his article (which was where my whole blog posted started 🙂 )