not a huge thing, but did anyone ever consider adding support for functions to name? JS has a name property, and I was expecting name to just access that, as the implementation for functions. eg: (ignore reagent stuff in the error)

Asking here before filing a bug: anyone else bumped into "goog.debug.Logger is not a constructor"? My figwheel-main setup broke with this error when I upgraded CLJS 1.10.879 -> 1.10.893

@dazld we do in some case generate names to aid w/ debugging (fns inside top-levels) - there are some complexities around handling scope etc.

but there is a bigger problem which polluting the top scope if you do it at the top level

i.e. var my.namespace.foo = function my$namespace$foo(...) { ... }

it was a very lazy thought. a map or so would be more appropriate for carrying an identifier around with a fn, for sure.

the symmetry was appealing though

it is an interesting question - around the time where we did source maps such things were considered and avoided for the above reasons