This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
- # babashka (22)
- # beginners (58)
- # calva (14)
- # clj-kondo (3)
- # cljs-dev (4)
- # clojure (17)
- # clojure-dev (4)
- # clojure-italy (6)
- # clojure-uk (2)
- # clojurescript (32)
- # conjure (9)
- # crux (29)
- # cursive (2)
- # figwheel-main (48)
- # fulcro (77)
- # helix (2)
- # jobs-discuss (3)
- # joker (2)
- # pathom (3)
- # quil (3)
- # re-frame (24)
- # reitit (6)
- # shadow-cljs (11)
- # tools-deps (8)
@hammerha As an aside, you can write
Math/PI instead of
(.-PI js/Math) as well as
(Math/sin (/ Math/PI 2)) instead of
(.sin js/Math (/ (.-PI js/Math) 2)) . The former expressions are also portable to Clojure. These work in ClojureScript because there is a
Hi guys, I had to create/use a non standard range function like this:
And I was wondering, do you know a clojurescript lib that gives this functionality?
(range-math 0 1 5) ;; => (0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1) (range-math 0 1 5 :log) ;; => (0 0.5118833609788743 0.7403626894942438 0.8893017025063101 1)
@lilactown It's maybe a small amount of use cases in ClojureScript world, but this is one of the main reason why people likes Numpy lib in the Python world ^^'
I'm tempted to use leiningen +
deps.cljs 😅 but I'm sure there's a proper way to generate a POM or something. I'm guessing I would still deploy to a maven repo
I don't know how to convince ClojureScript or Closure tooling that the npm package is Closure JS, not some random crap
in other news, I've discovered a project called "tsickle" - converts TypeScript to Closure JS https://github.com/angular/tsickle/ I might play with a mixed TS + CLJS project 🤪 but I would prefer to package my TS as a separate lib
I have a project where I wrap a JS lib: https://github.com/frozar/roughcljs I'm interest in hand-drawing things. To do so, I used leiningen + shadow-cljs. What I like with shadow-cljs is its facility to use npm lib. With shadow-cljs, you're still obliged to use another build tool to generate the jar package.
I’m in the middle of a long quest where the goal is actually to try out using React libs with @lilactown’s
hx. I’ve gotten
hx working with a
figwheel-main project, so that’s great, but using a React lib (more specifically,
figwheel-main is proving difficult.
I’ve started with a minimal project using
deps.edn and not much more, that actually manages to pull in React as bundled webpack dependency, as described in https://clojurescript.org/guides/webpack . That’s one part of the puzzle. The next big part is integrating
figwheel-main. I tried expanding on this minimal project as minimally as I could, using the tutorial at https://figwheel.org/#setting-up-a-build-with-tools-cli . But, when I get to the final step, running the clj, like this:
clojure -m figwheel.main -b dev -r
, it hangs forever.
The output looks like this:
Anyone know what I could be doing wrong?
Rees-MacBook-Pro:hello-bundler ree$ clj -m figwheel.main -b dev -r 2020-05-09 20:56:47.318:INFO::main: Logging initialized @4637ms to org.eclipse.jetty.util.log.StdErrLog [Figwheel] Compiling build dev to "target/public/cljs-out/dev-main.js"
I don't see anything weird there. What are you expecting to happen, and what is actually happening?
@U11BV7MTK I’m really getting a tour of build tools at the moment 😅 What’s a minimal example of what I want?
Are there notable differences in the development experience when using shadowcljs rather than figwheel, @U11BV7MTK?
otherwise they are running and hotloading your code in. both support nrepl so should work with most tooling