I just finished reading the doc on misuse of aget/aset for js objects and then stumbled on an example showing the wrong use of aget: http://cljs.github.io/api/cljs.core/DOT

You can get the value at property "foo" with any of the following:

(. o -foo)
;;=> "bar"

(.-foo o)
;;=> "bar"

(aget o "foo")
;;=> "bar"

@mark540 you could file an issue against that repo

@mfikes OK, I created CLJS-2985.

@mark540 Thanks. That JIRA is actually for the ClojureScript compiler. That site is an unofficial doc site on ClojureScript which presumably has a GitHub issues tracker.

That's where the github links on the doc site take me.

That site seems to be the official site for clojure doc, since it is linked to here: https://clojurescript.org/reference/documentation

there's a doc that talks about the misuse of aget/aset?

@jesse.wertheim It is a subtopic in https://clojurescript.org/news/2017-07-14-checked-array-access

ahh, thanks

I figured that was the rationale but I don't think I'd read it anywhere official before

@mark540 I can’t figure out where the source is, but it appears to be here https://github.com/cljs/cljs.github.io/blob/master/api/cljs.core/DOT.html#L63

Hmm, that source doesn't have the example I mentioned. Anyway, I could try filing a jira there.

Oops, I see it now.

But like you said, that doesn't appear to be the source project and there are no issues filed there.

So... I'm having trouble understanding the distinction and connection between boot and clj cli/`deps.edn` ... is the clj cli boot? are they one in the same? did the cli grow out of boot? did certain conventions come over from boot (like .cljs.edn files) intentionally or are they just kind of artifacts from libraries that used to use boot?

They are different and unrelated

Many Clojure tools use .edn files for config

gotcha. figured that was a dumb question 😅 . Thanks!

Hi, 1) is there no equivalent of clojure.repl/source in cljs? 2) I see that the tooltip for filter at http://cljs.info/cheatsheet/ is wrong (is same as for keep) - how to report / fix? (The docstring in the code is correct - https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/blob/master/src/main/cljs/cljs/core.cljs#L5103) 3) The whole http://clojuredocs.org/ is down (502) but I guess that is a known issue 🙂 Thank you!

@holyjak ad 1) http://cljs.github.io/api/cljs.repl/#source

I'm seeing an order of magnitude overhead for variadic functions, is this expected?

https://gist.github.com/mseddon/c40767dc2042b0d18ab8a69484c75116

[org.clojure/clojurescript "1.10.312"]

this is without :optimizations :advanced, let me just double check that doesn't go away...

yeah, closure compiler optimizes it away. still- worth watching out for. (now everything takes ~30ms, which is interesting..)

phew. protocols cost the same too with :advanced. Okay, I can relax again 🙂

@mseddon :advanced is less important than :static-fns

generally you don't set :static-fns during dev though because you could get into a funny place at the REPL

aha, right, thanks

I hadn't realised :static-fns was a thing, so that probably explains the mess I am in

Closure doesn't do that much with fn optimization - it really is the ClojureScript knobs that make that faster

but again we don't enable that by default because you might redefine a fn

That's fair enough, I'd rather a REPL that works 😉

is anyone using the dotenv library with :npm-deps by any chance?

I cannot make it work for the life of me