Is there something equivalent to lazy-seq, but which does not do chunking?

I basically want a sequence that gets the next element from a remote server, but I want it to get exactly one element at a time, not in chunk

Has anyone read Paradigms in AI programming? Would the exercises/knowledge apply over to clojure or no

I see that on github there are people who did the exercises in clojure

Hum, actually it looks like my problem is either with apply or concat

It seems to always process four elements

I'm hoping someone can tell me what the name is of this clojure or clojurescript library I'm trying to remember. I came across it recently (don't remember where) and it has to do with using excel-like formulas in spreadsheets (things like =POW(2, 3)). I believe it was being used so that users could enter these formulas into web apps. Does anyone know what that might be?

Is it possible to have a global deps.edn? Stuff that gets merged in every call to clojure.

Hi, anybody using funcool/cats around here?

@henrik ~/.clojure/deps.edn I think

is there a "better" way of chaining calls to map on a list?

like, currently I'm doing (->> lst (map :thing) (map first) (map :stuff) (map some-fn)) ...

which I guess is fine, but ...

I believe that’s equivalent to (comp (map :thing) (map first) (map :stuff) (map some-fn) ...) i.e. using transducers.

Or I should say ((comp (map :thing) (map first) (map :stuff) (map some-fn) ...) lst)

You could also go (map (comp some-fn :stuff first :thing)) though the ordering thing may make it confusing

yeah, you'll have to reverse the function calls with comp

still useful if there's lots of repetition though

The transducers version does not require you to reverse the order (which hurts my brain, but it’s true), and it’s a bit more efficient.

Just don’t comp transducers and non-transducers in the same comp, or it really hurty-brain.

the other caveat with transducers is that comp of transducers produces another transducer, so you have to use it in a transducing context like into

Which linting tool is most common? eastwood?

for cljs

*best

"Eastwood supports only Clojure on Java, not ClojureScript or Clojure/CLR."

Hello everybody! is there a way to run a app with clojure tool cli from github if it contains java sources? I would like to do clj -Sdeps {:deps {may-app {:git/url "...." :sha "..."}}} -m my-app.main

Hi everyone. Is there a way to create namespace aliases for use in namespaced keywords without creating a new Clojure namespace? I know that I can use in-ns to create the namespace and then create an alias for that, but is that the idiomatic approach?

you don't need to create a namespace for namespaced keywords

can just do :whatever/keyword

I know. It’s just the aliasing feature I would like, e.g., to avoid writing a long namespace again and again

oh sorry

np 🙂

Running (def a ( "/home/user/file.txt" :encoding "cp850")) and then lsof | grep file.txt I get a whole lot of threads using file.txt

Any ideas?

if I want a function to gain access to the namespace in which it is being declared, I can define something like this

(def my-ns (str *ns*))
(defn namespacify-symbol
  "if the symbol is missing a namespace, lend it ours"
  [s]
  (if (nil? (namespace s))
    (symbol my-ns (str s))
    s))

is there a nicer way? (I'd like to avoid the specific declaration of my-ns if I can)

oh I suppose I can use a let statement instead

Is there any (easy) way to call FORTRAN code from clojure, or is this a Bad and Dumb Idea?