This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-05-28
Channels
- # aws (1)
- # babashka (113)
- # beginners (41)
- # cider (9)
- # cljdoc (15)
- # cljs-dev (8)
- # cljsrn (5)
- # clojure (113)
- # clojure-australia (4)
- # clojure-europe (40)
- # clojure-nl (8)
- # clojure-taiwan (1)
- # clojure-uk (60)
- # clojurescript (59)
- # code-reviews (2)
- # conjure (1)
- # datahike (12)
- # events (1)
- # jobs (1)
- # kaocha (4)
- # lsp (24)
- # luminus (19)
- # malli (4)
- # off-topic (28)
- # pathom (10)
- # philosophy (1)
- # portal (6)
- # re-frame (3)
- # reagent (9)
- # remote-jobs (1)
- # shadow-cljs (31)
- # sql (24)
- # tools-deps (6)
- # xtdb (14)
TGIF! 🙂
I had totally forgotten about the bank holiday. I’m working but two of my colleagues are taking Monday off.
(over here it’s “Memorial Day” which is a holiday for banks/government and most regular workers — but my company treats all holidays as fungible since it has so many different cultures)
¡morening
Happy Friday 😄
morning
Morning
I am surprised that IPv6 is not as ubiquitous as I thought it would be. I remember when I learned about them in vocational school 8 years ago. I would have thought by now that we would be using them for everything 😄
I thought that ipv6 is the default at many places now. The ipv4 thing is there because everyone is afraid of backwards compatibility. (guess who has the oldest networks?)
An ipv6 link local address is normally provisionsed on all NICs these days, on mostly all OSs (unless it's turned off etc.. etc...), so you can ping other local hosts on the same broadcast domain
But, having a company actually configure IPv6 routing and having a dhcpv6 server up and running etc...well, not that many. Bigger ones perhaps...
I know some of the words you just said 😄
0/10 …. guess that’s a bummer
The adoption rate of ipv6 is growing, simply because the ipv4 address space is now exhausted, and NAT will only take you so far
About 30% of the top 1000 websites are accessible via ipv6. Still a ways to go, but every day it grows.
I think one of the biggest fears is the unfounded notion that because every device on your network gets it's own globally unique ipv6 address (if your ISP hands them out), then suddently every device on your network is reachable from the outside.
That's simply not true. Your firewall will block any unestablished connections from the outside to inside your network, just like normal.
It's funny, the amount of unique addreses that I can provision for my own internal network, using my own unique local address, i.e., fd10::/64
is over 18 quintrillion addresses
In 2000, AltaVista was used by 17.7% of Internet users while Google was only used by 7% of Internet users, according to Media Metrix.[15]
I remember being blown away because you could actually "ask" stuff to http://askjeeves.com
you mean something like a site:A.com,
query @ashnur? if google supported more than 1 site on the site:
list
i'm clearly not understanding 😬
right now a large chunk of my browsing goes through google, but it's only due to my laziness and the fact that I use lots of websites that they themselves are changing constantly, otherwise, I could set up bookmarks and bookmarklets and snippets and scraping and whatnot.
the problem with this is that 1. can't index authenticated websites or anything that's private 2. I can't do analytics on my own searches very easily.
ah, and it's particularly [1] that's the issue
but like all p2p stuff, goes against the status quo, which is about trying to capture users, not about trying to build a specific tool for a specific problem (as opposed to rent seeking, where you charge someone for every hit with the hammer 😄 )
I know about several solutions where people setup mirrors for search engines. But I don't know the details, seems like something else. e.g. https://searx.ir/
https://searx.github.io/searx/admin/plugins.html like, these are all nice but