Good Morning!

mogge

Morning

👋 Thursday last week was my last day of work for the year - nice to have a relaxing finish to the year.

morning

månmån

morning

FWIW i prefer routes defined as functions that take maps

i like being able to execute them in the repl

i like being able to unit test them like regular fns

Oh, you're all talking about handlers, not routers.

how does every route as a function work @jiriknesl? do they get called in sequence until one says yes ?

Is it common, if you have a map and a value to a key is a function, to name the key something like foo-bar-fn?

{:foo-bar-fn (fn [x y] (+ x y))} for example

or simply

{:foo-bar (fn [x y] (+ x y))}

@dharrigan I lean toward -fn (and you'll see that in next.jdbc and elsewhere in my OSS code) but I don't know how widespread that is...

thank you

I think I agree, it makes it clearer what the key is about

@mccraigmccraig as @dharrigan says, your route is a triplet of name (keyword), url->action (fn), action->url (fn). Action route goes through all url->action which either return controller action with params or nothing. The last in a row is default catchall error router.

That sounds very slow :)

Also, how do you build your sitemap automatically!

It is not slower than Sinatra’s get '/' do … end or equivalent in almost all other frameworks out there.

For a sitemap, every router could potentially enumerate all routes the router is aware of.