☀️ Morning

😼 mogge

🙃 umown 🙂

👋

✨ ☕ ✨

☕

☕

I almost never have two back to back any more… It’s that kind of a Friday…

Still “HELLO!” to you all 🙂

does anyone have a clever trick for using or within ->>?

'some->>' ?

got a concrete example? i think in practice i’ve usually come up with a named function to represent that step

i sometimes stick a (#(or % :foo)) step in. feels a bit dirty tho

In the end I have changed my ->> for a -> and turned my (re-find #"re") step into a (->> (re-find #"re"))

I did consider a custom or-like macro that reversed its arguments first, but it didn’t seem worth it.

and there is always as-> @peterwestmacott

yes, but with as-> I cannot use bare keywords or functions

eg. (as-> {:foo 1} x :foo inc)

I think the friction is because the re-* functions have their arguments backwards

it would also be nice if regexes acted as functions

or maybe if re-find handled nils gracefully

what’s the clojure way of comparing lists/seqs when you don’t care about the order of the items?

a set 🙂

oh, I guess duplication might matter.

yeah, I’m currently just converting both my actual and expected lists into sets

otherwise I guess I could order if I care about dups

Thought there might be a nicer way to do the comparison. Don’t really want to pull in midje just for this https://github.com/marick/Midje/wiki/Checkers-for-collections-and-strings

sort them both?

(defn same-contents [a b] (= (sort a) (sort b))) should work?

sets! they are always the answer 🙂

should read more, before commenting... 🐢

You could also use frequencies if you care about duplicates