Clojurians Log v2

Good morning everyone 👋🏽 I think I've found a bug in spec, and before I submit it, would appreciate if someone could look over my shoulder and educate me if the bug is in my thinking... Specifically, this is about validating a value against a spec defined as (s/and :spec/one :spec/two) First, an example that works like how I expect.

;; expected behaviour
  (s/def :working.test1/one string?)
  (s/def :working/test1
    (s/keys :opt [:working.test1/one]))

  (s/def :working.test2/two number?)
  (s/def :working/test2
    (s/keys :opt [:working.test2/two]))

  (s/def :working/test
    (s/and :working/test1
           :working/test2))

  (def test-value
    {:working.test1/one "a string"
     :working.test2/two 1.23456})

  (s/valid? :working/test1
            test-value) ;; true
  (s/valid? :working/test2
            test-value) ;; true
  (s/valid? :working/test
            test-value) ;; true

;; unexpected behaviour
  (s/def :broken.test1/one
    ;; this s/or is required to trigger the unexpected behaviour
    (s/or :s string?
          :n number?))
  (s/def :broken/test1
    (s/keys :opt [:broken.test1/one]))

  (s/def :broken.test2/two
    number?)
  (s/def :broken/test2
    (s/keys :opt [:broken.test2/two]))

  (s/def :broken/test
    (s/and :broken/test1
           :broken/test2))

  (def test-value-2
    {:broken.test1/one "one"
     :broken.test2/two 123})
  (def test-value-3
    {:broken.test1/one 1.0
     :broken.test2/two 123})

  (s/valid? :broken/test1
            test-value-2) ;; true
  (s/valid? :broken/test1
            test-value-3) ;; true

  (s/valid? :broken/test2
            test-value-2) ;; true
  (s/valid? :broken/test2
            test-value-3) ;; true

  (s/valid? :broken/test
            test-value-2) ;; false ;; wait, what?!
  (s/valid? :broken/test
            test-value-3) ;; false ;; !!!