This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2021-12-14
Channels
- # adventofcode (38)
- # announcements (42)
- # aws (3)
- # babashka (8)
- # beginners (165)
- # calva (36)
- # chlorine-clover (14)
- # cider (6)
- # clj-kondo (5)
- # cljsrn (33)
- # clojure (27)
- # clojure-australia (1)
- # clojure-czech (1)
- # clojure-doc (1)
- # clojure-europe (26)
- # clojure-nl (6)
- # clojure-spec (6)
- # clojure-uk (3)
- # clojurescript (10)
- # code-reviews (20)
- # conjure (1)
- # core-logic (5)
- # cursive (3)
- # data-science (5)
- # datomic (35)
- # emacs (1)
- # figwheel-main (3)
- # fulcro (10)
- # honeysql (1)
- # introduce-yourself (4)
- # jobs (3)
- # jobs-discuss (4)
- # minecraft (2)
- # missionary (28)
- # nextjournal (3)
- # off-topic (45)
- # pathom (7)
- # polylith (1)
- # portal (22)
- # practicalli (2)
- # re-frame (4)
- # reagent (19)
- # releases (3)
- # remote-jobs (3)
- # reveal (1)
- # rum (4)
- # shadow-cljs (37)
- # spacemacs (14)
- # sql (1)
- # tools-build (7)
- # tools-deps (16)
- # vim (13)
- # xtdb (15)
With multi specs, unlike with or
I can't get back the matching case when calling conform. What should I do in case I want to take actions based on the spec the input matches?
You can use whatever dispatch function you use for the multi-spec to also branch in other parts of the code. The obvious case is a :type
key or something similar
I was hoping I wouldn't need to retread this path because I considered it an implementation detail
If it's a closed set of branches you can use or
with a predicate that matches on the "type" -- which I suppose is probably the reason that multi-specs don't conform with a tag. If you're trying to parse a structure against an open set of branches you could end up with any value as the tag, so you'd need another multimethod to dispatch to code which handles the conformed values. If you don't expect consumers of the namespace to extend the spec I'd say just use or