clojure-spec 2021-11-11 | Slack Archive

Is there a version of flowing s/and for spec1 or a workaround that produces the same effect? (a version that doesn't pass conformed values to subsequent predicates, as described in https://github.com/clojure/spec-alpha2/wiki/Differences-from-spec.alpha#nonflowing-sand--new).

(s/and (s/nonconforming <your-spec>) …)

You’ll need to wrap each spec that you want to avoid conforming for in s/nonconforming, more specifically

@U0CLLU3QT you are wonderful, thank you kindly. You've got me out of a very tricky hole!

👍 1

2021-11-11