clojure-spec 2019-10-18 | Slack Archive

what’s the idiomatic way to assert results of stest/check?

not sure how idiomatic this is but

(deftest foo-test
  (is (= 1 (-> (st/check `foo)
               (st/summarize-results)
               :check-passed))))

okay, but let’s say it returns nil and I want to print that out with expound, I guess I’m gonna have to run st/check one more time?

not sure about the expound part

(expound/explain-results (stest/check `foo))

would print out the reason in human readable form, right? But it doesn’t return anything, so no way to assert it. and I can’t do something like:

(let [chk (stest/check `foo] ,,,

to re-use it for both

for assertion and for human-readable output

I’ve never tried to use expound with test.check output

which part doesn’t return anything?

explain-results? you could use

(doto (stest/check `foo) expound/explain-results)

if so

ah yeah, nifty doto. Cool, thanks!

👍 4

ah, the problem with doto approach though - stest/check throws on failure… damn

hmm really? maybe I’m thinking of something else but I thought it returned a map with useful failure info

or maybe that’s in the exception

can someone show me an example of deftest where combination of stest/check used with expound

Oh… wow… this is pretty cool.

Haven’t tried it yet, but it’s on my list.

Really awesome ideas, thank you guys!

we use Kaocha’s feature, it works very well

2019-10-18