This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2019-08-30
Channels
- # aleph (15)
- # announcements (4)
- # aws (2)
- # bangalore-clj (7)
- # beginners (236)
- # calva (24)
- # cider (11)
- # cljs-dev (63)
- # clojure (141)
- # clojure-europe (3)
- # clojure-india (2)
- # clojure-italy (8)
- # clojure-nl (3)
- # clojure-spec (8)
- # clojure-uk (52)
- # clojured (1)
- # clojuredesign-podcast (4)
- # clojurescript (35)
- # clojutre (3)
- # community-development (1)
- # cursive (77)
- # data-science (1)
- # datomic (3)
- # emacs (13)
- # fulcro (7)
- # graalvm (78)
- # graphql (2)
- # nrepl (7)
- # off-topic (18)
- # pathom (25)
- # reagent (12)
- # reitit (31)
- # shadow-cljs (178)
- # spacemacs (7)
- # tools-deps (32)
- # xtdb (10)
- # yada (3)
No, we will probably hold off on that till churn slows down
Generating from the spec: (s/inst-in #inst "1984" #inst "2019")
will just return dates from 1984
What’s the idiomatic way of generating random dates within a range?
#inst
only works with string literals and not computed strings
Samples are biased to beginning of the range, but “grow” as you make more
4
So if you sample a larger number you’ll see more variety