This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2019-08-24
Channels
- # announcements (1)
- # beginners (113)
- # calva (16)
- # cider (6)
- # cljsrn (1)
- # clojure (104)
- # clojure-argentina (2)
- # clojure-dev (3)
- # clojure-italy (1)
- # clojure-nl (10)
- # clojure-spec (6)
- # clojure-uk (4)
- # clojuredesign-podcast (44)
- # clojurescript (25)
- # core-async (2)
- # datomic (21)
- # emacs (14)
- # events (1)
- # figwheel-main (12)
- # fulcro (7)
- # joker (2)
- # leiningen (1)
- # mount (7)
- # music (1)
- # off-topic (16)
- # pedestal (3)
- # re-frame (8)
- # reagent (8)
- # reitit (11)
- # shadow-cljs (4)
- # spacemacs (16)
- # sql (1)
- # tools-deps (14)
- # vim (1)
Are unqualified keywords not supported for closed specs? Closed specs seem to work as expected with namespaced keyword specs but the unqualified keyword form doesn’t seem to work with closed.
are you referring to s/keys req-un or opt-un specifically? are there other aspects of specs that support "unqualified" ?
Refering to the examples here https://github.com/clojure/spec-alpha2/wiki/Schema-and-select#literal-schemas the unqualified form doesn’t seem to be recognized by the closed option.