This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2019-07-02
Channels
- # announcements (1)
- # beginners (119)
- # calva (2)
- # cider (40)
- # cljsrn (14)
- # clojure (145)
- # clojure-dev (122)
- # clojure-europe (4)
- # clojure-italy (9)
- # clojure-nl (5)
- # clojure-spec (2)
- # clojure-uk (32)
- # clojuredesign-podcast (1)
- # clojurescript (10)
- # cursive (44)
- # data-science (1)
- # datomic (53)
- # defnpodcast (6)
- # emacs (6)
- # fulcro (13)
- # garden (25)
- # graalvm (3)
- # graphql (7)
- # jobs (3)
- # liberator (4)
- # nrepl (1)
- # off-topic (21)
- # quil (27)
- # reagent (4)
- # reitit (2)
- # remote-jobs (1)
- # ring-swagger (3)
- # shadow-cljs (3)
- # spacemacs (24)
- # sql (29)
- # tools-deps (68)
- # xtdb (2)
Is there a way to get around the limitation of s/merge that it only conforms one branch of merge?
This is really really really detrimental.