This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2019-12-11
Channels
- # adventofcode (31)
- # announcements (6)
- # babashka (5)
- # beginners (93)
- # calva (15)
- # cider (20)
- # cljs-dev (16)
- # clojure (159)
- # clojure-berlin (1)
- # clojure-dev (5)
- # clojure-europe (9)
- # clojure-italy (9)
- # clojure-losangeles (2)
- # clojure-nl (26)
- # clojure-spec (7)
- # clojure-uk (33)
- # clojurescript (54)
- # clojutre (5)
- # cursive (20)
- # datomic (23)
- # emacs (19)
- # events (1)
- # expound (1)
- # figwheel-main (1)
- # fulcro (104)
- # hyperfiddle (1)
- # jobs (1)
- # luminus (10)
- # malli (59)
- # nrepl (1)
- # off-topic (11)
- # pathom (5)
- # planck (15)
- # reagent (13)
- # reitit (8)
- # rewrite-clj (10)
- # ring-swagger (3)
- # shadow-cljs (129)
- # tools-deps (46)
- # xtdb (14)
- # yada (1)
I never got further then the question is it possible to make a Clojure lib that implements the APL semantics (of which I know next to nothing).
That looks like APL to me... but somehow I think I'd prefer more readable and writeable characters
"That looks like APL to me" might be my new favorite way of saying "I can't understand that"
When I was at IBM we were once talking about how impossible APL was. And one colleague asked what the A in APL was standing for... He managed to work out what the PL part was.
So what you're saying is that people from IBM are probably not time travellers with a weird sense of humor?
That just looks like more evidence that they're time travellers to me. :face_with_monocle:
But how composable are rymes, could you just pick the rhyming parts of a couple together to make a new poem?
@borkdude if you unravel that secret and combine that with a deep understanding of SPL (http://shakespearelang.sourceforge.net/report/shakespeare/) you will be on the right track for the ultimate literate programming language