This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-09-18
Channels
- # 100-days-of-code (10)
- # announcements (2)
- # aws (3)
- # beginners (120)
- # boot (6)
- # calva (6)
- # cider (22)
- # cljsrn (3)
- # clojure (145)
- # clojure-greece (1)
- # clojure-italy (7)
- # clojure-nl (24)
- # clojure-russia (90)
- # clojure-spec (21)
- # clojure-uk (80)
- # clojurescript (175)
- # core-async (1)
- # datomic (17)
- # emacs (8)
- # ethereum (5)
- # figwheel (1)
- # figwheel-main (140)
- # fulcro (137)
- # jobs (6)
- # jobs-discuss (3)
- # luminus (3)
- # mount (1)
- # nyc (3)
- # off-topic (39)
- # onyx (1)
- # pedestal (1)
- # re-frame (21)
- # reagent (13)
- # shadow-cljs (60)
- # spacemacs (25)
- # test-check (4)
- # tools-deps (14)
- # uncomplicate (3)
- # vim (18)
Learned I'm reading a book that's being deprecated before eoy, Pythons dependency management is "fucking horrible", and Canada has 40°¢ weather because of all the wasted compile cycles of statically typed languages 👍 👍
@nmdrenard No spoilers 😄
on the other hand, dynamically typed programs have to do more runtime checks during their entire lifecycle so who spends more energy isn’t that obvious to me 🙂
There was this tweet recently from a guy who rewrote his Python script into Rust in six hours and went from 1.6s to 26ms, so in 40 years he would start profiting (not the exact numbers, can’t find the tweet)
mandatory xkcd: https://xkcd.com/1205/
otoh, let's say that a single core costs 5 cents an hour on clouds, 6 hours is worth 600 euros, and 1.57s is saved... 600 euros * 5 cents per hour = 12000 hours of cloud time 12000 hours / 1.57s = 27,515,923 so that means the scripts need 27.5MM invocations before being profitable