Structure is nothing fancy

(deftest blah-test
  (let [foo ,,,
        bar ,,,]
    (is (,,, foo))
    (is (,,, bar))
    {:foo foo
     :bar bar}))

Nice one. What are dev seeds?

https://github.com/matthewdowney/rich-comment-tests has sneaked into our codebase more and more, and it makes much happy

Interesting! To eval, do you place the cursor after the let expression ends, and eval previous form?

> What are dev seeds? 'Seeds' as in Rails lingo - any DB insertion that adds 'seed' data - an admin user for example > To eval, do you place the cursor after the let expression ends, and eval previous form? Yep! Exactly. I had tried the rcf library before and found that it brought too much complexity to the src/ dir. A comment with a large prelude of requires isn't pretty. And neither is requiring-resolve With vanilla tests one uses requires as usual, test helpers, etc without fear of conflating tests with production matters.

This is probs old news, but it never stops amazing me. A symbol defined by deftest is just a function with some special metadata.