Fork me on GitHub
#clojure-europe
<
2020-08-27
>
slipset07:08:12

Yet another Clojure morning, question is, is it good?

slipset07:08:37

Oh, and on a related note, I deployed several bugs (around the same function) yesterday which would trivially be caught by a type system (or clojure.spec) (given that the types had been well defined (which you of course never can trust))

plexus08:08:27

good (I dare say) morning!

ouvasam08:08:38

good morning !

synthomat09:08:05

good morning!

otfrom10:08:58

(= morning good) => true

😍 3
genRaiy10:08:57

Please sir, may I have more ning? Yes, but only because it is good today.

otfrom10:08:28

there you go

otfrom10:08:34

one more because it is good

genRaiy10:08:53

thanks that's good ninging

otfrom10:08:49

I do what I can

ordnungswidrig10:08:27

Universal greeting should be updated to be "good anyth-ing" then? :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:

ordnungswidrig10:08:45

Or "good anyning?"

Vincent Cantin11:08:36

How about greating each other using (constantly! 'good) ?

slipset11:08:04

@ordnungswidrig I don't like asserting that the thing is good.

ordnungswidrig12:08:14

“some anyning”? @slipset

slipset12:08:26

Something like that.

slipset12:08:20

I guess a "How are you?" could be nice, but that's a bit inquisitive, and as a narcissistic introvert, not necessarily something I'm very interested in.

ordnungswidrig12:08:02

“How are you” in the sense of “I don’t actually care how you are but I show my empathy by pretending so”.

🙂 6
genRaiy12:08:34

it's why we talk about the weather ... displacement is my only joy these days, don't take it away

otfrom13:08:48

I suppose if you @ someone you are dereferencing their atom, so I suppose they should print whatever their state is

otfrom13:08:17

@otfrom

#object[ "0xdeadbeef" "com.otfrom.Me@deadbeef"]

genRaiy13:08:41

I like it but don't deref me

genRaiy14:08:18

#object ... I mean I literally object

ordnungswidrig20:08:16

Don’t treat me like an object! You combined my acting with my state!

😂 3