Yet another Clojure morning, question is, is it good?

Oh, and on a related note, I deployed several bugs (around the same function) yesterday which would trivially be caught by a type system (or clojure.spec) (given that the types had been well defined (which you of course never can trust))

good (I dare say) morning!

good morning !

good morning!

good morning!

(= morning good) => true

Please sir, may I have more ning? Yes, but only because it is good today.

ning

there you go

one more because it is good

thanks that's good ninging

I do what I can

Universal greeting should be updated to be "good anyth-ing" then? :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:

Or "good anyning?"

Good somening?

How about greating each other using (constantly! 'good) ?

@ordnungswidrig I don't like asserting that the thing is good.

“some anyning”? @slipset

Something like that.

I guess a "How are you?" could be nice, but that's a bit inquisitive, and as a narcissistic introvert, not necessarily something I'm very interested in.

“How are you” in the sense of “I don’t actually care how you are but I show my empathy by pretending so”.

Please check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%27m_Dysfunctional,_You%27re_Dysfunctional

it's why we talk about the weather ... displacement is my only joy these days, don't take it away

UMQ UGT

I suppose if you @ someone you are dereferencing their atom, so I suppose they should print whatever their state is

@otfrom

#object[ "0xdeadbeef" "com.otfrom.Me@deadbeef"]

I like it but don't deref me

@raymcdermott

#object ... I mean I literally object

Don’t treat me like an object! You combined my acting with my state!