This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-05-22
Channels
- # announcements (2)
- # aws (5)
- # babashka (17)
- # beginners (108)
- # calva (28)
- # chlorine-clover (7)
- # clj-kondo (14)
- # cljs-dev (9)
- # cljsrn (2)
- # clojure (118)
- # clojure-europe (50)
- # clojure-finland (5)
- # clojure-france (15)
- # clojure-italy (9)
- # clojure-nl (14)
- # clojure-spec (11)
- # clojure-uk (43)
- # clojuredesign-podcast (1)
- # clojurescript (35)
- # clojutre (2)
- # clr (3)
- # community-development (6)
- # conjure (9)
- # core-async (41)
- # cursive (7)
- # data-science (7)
- # datomic (11)
- # events (1)
- # figwheel-main (4)
- # fulcro (20)
- # ghostwheel (9)
- # graalvm (18)
- # helix (46)
- # leiningen (14)
- # observability (2)
- # off-topic (23)
- # pathom (4)
- # re-frame (5)
- # reitit (5)
- # rum (2)
- # shadow-cljs (32)
- # spacemacs (8)
- # specter (5)
- # sql (36)
- # timbre (3)
- # vim (15)
- # xtdb (2)
- # yada (2)
anyone finding their local/national gov'ts are increasing funding for cycling/walking/active travel? Just responding to 2 things locally in Scotland
as in money being spent from gov't budgets to do things like put in new bike lanes, signs, etc
(tho sometimes infrastructure is just "magic paint that is meant to protect cyclists from cars")
😄 I feel infrastructure for cyclists in munich is okay’ish… they could however improve big intersections
they put in a whole bunch of "temporary" extra bike lanes in Berlin. Of course some of them are just used as extra parking space... Really hoping some of them become permanent.
I suppose for is good for cartesian products, but tbh, I just reach for math.combinatorics then so I can be explicit
(where people typically (doall (map f seq))
its a false friend, that's why
well, perhaps not if you have a python background
but from a java perspective its squarely in the uncanny valley
hey how do you guys forster good code quality in your team? do you do training? workshops? do code reviews suffice?
code reviews, of your own as well as other people's
but I find it can take a while for 'good quality' to emerge; good quality code is code that can be easily adapted to changing businesss requirements
which is a bit chicken-and-egg it takes a while to figure out what the business is likely to want to change and what they are not
that was always my experience anyway
If you write something, and it works, and it doesn't need to be touched for the next 5 years, then abstract notions of quality are less important
I’m really frustrated by our team, the guys have no urge to improve the quality. just keep adding more and more mud, just to have instant gratification and move to the next ticket
I think I’ll need to set up some workshops, which is again another problem for me because it costs a lot of my time
well, if you are getting paid by the ticket
then that is your incentive
once of the downsides of weakly types languages is that people get a bit frightened of changing anything
ah I’m not even talking about clojure; we do kotlin. But my question would also apply to Clojure of course
you need really strong generative testing to overcome The Fear
oh right
clojure has the 'additive' philosophy to change, which sometimes gets (mis) interpreted as > we are not allowed to change anything that has been written
maybe individual code reviews is not so bad and we should do reviews in groups in front of a projector
which seems very unfortunate
I don't think it is supposed to mean that but that might just be me