This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-10-09
Channels
- # 100-days-of-code (6)
- # announcements (4)
- # atlanta-clojurians (1)
- # aws (1)
- # beginners (65)
- # boot (21)
- # cider (9)
- # cljsrn (3)
- # clojure (186)
- # clojure-android (4)
- # clojure-conj (1)
- # clojure-dev (12)
- # clojure-germany (3)
- # clojure-italy (8)
- # clojure-nl (1)
- # clojure-russia (32)
- # clojure-spec (19)
- # clojure-uk (41)
- # clojurescript (83)
- # core-async (5)
- # cursive (18)
- # datomic (15)
- # emacs (5)
- # events (4)
- # fulcro (7)
- # hyperfiddle (4)
- # leiningen (4)
- # liberator (1)
- # off-topic (65)
- # overtone (4)
- # pedestal (5)
- # perun (1)
- # planck (3)
- # re-frame (1)
- # reagent (3)
- # rum (5)
- # shadow-cljs (8)
- # spacemacs (19)
- # testing (3)
- # tools-deps (4)
- # yada (6)
@rpkn @bhauman the reflection issue should be fixed with 1.10.0-beta2, would appreciate knowing otherwise!
So much for being "feature complete" then, eh? With the addition of clojure.datafy
in Beta 2 🙂
@alexmiller The Change Log has "CLJ-2414 Detect phase and overhaul exception message and printing" -- that should be 2415 I think and the description duplicates "CLJ-2373 Detect phase and overhaul exception message and printing"
Also 2414 isn't listed under the Java 9/10/11 stuff which it seems like it should be?
Yeah I got those in the wrong place somehow, will fix
At least clojure.datafy
’s docstring says alpha. Maybe it should have alpha
as its last segment. 😀
We have Beta 1 live on one production server now. Testing Beta 2 in dev 🙂
Rich's decisions trump any earlier announcements, up to and including going from beta back to alpha 🙂
And besides, deep down, weren't you really hoping for some more new features in the next release?
:rolling_on_the_floor_laughing: OK, it's a fair cop -- I was a bit disappointed when Alex announced the Beta and said it was feature complete 🙂