This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-08-24
Channels
- # admin-announcements (1)
- # alda (22)
- # aws-lambda (1)
- # beginners (9)
- # boot (17)
- # cider (39)
- # cljs-dev (10)
- # cljsjs (1)
- # cljsrn (14)
- # clojure (88)
- # clojure-android (1)
- # clojure-dev (9)
- # clojure-india (1)
- # clojure-russia (271)
- # clojure-spec (5)
- # clojure-uk (101)
- # clojurescript (74)
- # clojutre (11)
- # component (2)
- # cursive (24)
- # datascript (7)
- # datomic (9)
- # dirac (13)
- # docs (3)
- # emacs (4)
- # garden (21)
- # hoplon (9)
- # jobs-rus (5)
- # lein-figwheel (3)
- # leiningen (13)
- # luminus (12)
- # off-topic (1)
- # om (24)
- # onyx (84)
- # proton (3)
- # re-frame (39)
- # reagent (21)
- # rethinkdb (1)
- # slack-help (10)
- # specter (4)
- # test-check (1)
- # untangled (35)
- # yada (2)
@alexmiller the ns
spec breaks genclass forms that need to use non-simple class names (e.g. array class names) where using a symbol is not possible and a string is needed
interesting - comprehensive examples were hard to find. yes, please.
I'm 100% familiar with the genclass grammar but the gist is that wherever we use simple-symbol for classnames we should use (U simple-symbol? string?)
(in the gen-class form that's breaking I have :constructors {["[Ljava.lang.String;"] [String String]}
)
that makes sense
@bronsa Thank you for that heads up on java.jdbc
breaking some code. Definitely not intended and easy to fix on my end.