Fork me on GitHub
#cljsrn
<
2017-09-25
>
ricardo.ekm01:09:51

Thanks @krauser! I'll check this out!

rovanion09:09:13

@jeaye Is it a bad idea to use re-natal?

pesterhazy11:09:57

@rovanion what makes you think that?

pesterhazy12:09:18

ah.. I'd interpret that more as "let's all help fix re-natal issues" 🙂

pesterhazy12:09:54

@drapanjanas does a great job maintaining it IMO

pesterhazy12:09:31

there's a lot of room for improvement of course but re-natal is very usable at this point and up-to-date with react-native

bhauman12:09:09

@rovanion I think re-natal is a good way to go.

jeaye16:09:39

@rovanion I don't know of a better solution than re-natal right now, so you should definitely use it. As @pesterhazy said, I'm more focused on raising attention about re-natals issues so we can all improve it more.

jeaye16:09:29

Multiple design issues are have caused us to insert workarounds in both our workflow and our source code.

pesterhazy16:09:43

@jeaye can you give an example? I'm curious

jeaye17:09:56

The former, which shows the forced layout and separation of Android/iOS code is a facade and both are actually run on both devices. The latter, which requires us to keep changes in our index/stash for .re-natal which we can't commit.