Clojurians Log v2

Hello, I've experimented embedding Scittle (SCI) into a GPLv2 licensed CMS system's ReactJS based WYSIWYG editor. Technically this works simply by including the EPL1.0 licensed Scittle (https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/scittle@0.6.22/dist/scittle.js) and MIT licensed Reagent library into a CMS plugin. However, I'm facing a licensing problem with the CMS system's plugin marketplace/repository rules stating following (drum roll): > All code, data, and images — anything stored in the plugin directory hosted on http://WordPress.org — must comply with the GPL or a GPL-Compatible license. Included third-party libraries, code, images, or otherwise, must be compatible. > Calling third party CDNs for reasons other than font inclusions; all non-service related JavaScript and CSS must be included locally - https://developer.wordpress.org/plugins/wordpress-org/detailed-plugin-guidelines/#2-developers-are-responsible-for-the-contents-and-actions-of-their-plugins Thus, I believe this Scittle cannot be either included as part of a plugin or be loaded via CDN for using in this context while simultaneously passing the plugin repository rules. I chatted with Michiel about the issue on #scittle channel and he could gladly on his change his project's licensing to a compatible BSD-3 license for making such use case possible but legality of that is questionable as SCI licensing states:

Copyright © 2019-2022 Michiel Borkent

Distributed under the Eclipse Public License 1.0. This project contains code from Clojure and ClojureScript which are also licensed under the EPL 1.0. See LICENSE.

- https://github.com/babashka/SCI?tab=readme-ov-file#license How does the copyleft nature of EPL1.0 work in this case - are these projects (Scittle & SCI) considered derivative work of Clojure / ClojureScript in a way that relicensing them to BSD-3 would be practically impossible, thus rendering such use case a dead end by being non-compliant according the WordPress plugin repository guidelines?