This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2022-05-13
Channels
- # aleph (6)
- # announcements (10)
- # asami (3)
- # babashka (111)
- # babashka-sci-dev (20)
- # beginners (28)
- # calva (28)
- # clj-http (2)
- # clj-kondo (23)
- # cljs-dev (16)
- # cljsrn (23)
- # clojure (116)
- # clojure-czech (3)
- # clojure-europe (33)
- # clojure-nl (1)
- # clojure-norway (7)
- # clojure-uk (5)
- # clojurescript (41)
- # community-development (2)
- # cursive (5)
- # datahike (4)
- # datomic (13)
- # figwheel-main (3)
- # fulcro (11)
- # google-cloud (1)
- # gratitude (8)
- # hyperfiddle (14)
- # jobs (2)
- # lsp (22)
- # malli (4)
- # off-topic (4)
- # other-languages (4)
- # pathom (13)
- # portal (40)
- # rdf (11)
- # reitit (1)
- # sci (15)
- # shadow-cljs (7)
- # specter (1)
- # sql (6)
- # xtdb (4)
@dnolen Sorry I didn't follow up on that, but it wasn't a bug I could reproduce. I thought I reproduced it. but that was just a limitation of protocols not being able to support varargs, so ((MetaFn. (fn [& xs])) 0 .. 22)
is never going to work.
I did run into this while trying to apply
the MetaFn
as well, but I had trouble reproducing it and since I had a workaround (going via (.-afn the-meta-fn)
), I gave up.
ok, so I think this is not related to the other thing unless you checked this was a regression
but yeah static invokes for 20+ args need compiler support, and a ticket exists for that
In my code, I had (apply f x1 x2 xs)
and this failed when xs was longer than 18-20-ish elements
that's great and I'm happy with the workaround, since it will support older CLJS versions too
@alexmiller can we rebuild the website?