This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2017-03-23
Channels
- # beginners (63)
- # cljs-dev (1)
- # cljsjs (1)
- # cljsrn (11)
- # clojure (208)
- # clojure-berlin (2)
- # clojure-dusseldorf (5)
- # clojure-italy (5)
- # clojure-norway (56)
- # clojure-russia (7)
- # clojure-spec (85)
- # clojure-uk (27)
- # clojurescript (191)
- # core-async (73)
- # cursive (4)
- # datomic (62)
- # defnpodcast (1)
- # hoplon (2)
- # jobs-rus (1)
- # juxt (14)
- # keechma (1)
- # leiningen (1)
- # lumo (126)
- # off-topic (2)
- # om (11)
- # onyx (27)
- # pedestal (52)
- # planck (21)
- # powderkeg (1)
- # re-frame (32)
- # reagent (14)
- # ring-swagger (1)
- # rum (3)
- # slack-help (19)
- # specter (23)
- # untangled (32)
- # vim (7)
- # yada (43)
I don't have a minimal repro, but this commit https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/commit/86f26bf267f1c729313320c38e53e64450c0e68d somehow causes a regression on a dual-hexacore box when compiling with :parallel-build true
with the compiler throwing https://gist.github.com/mfikes/408fb49010a3bce8bc35b151411ee738
FWIW, the stack traces are extremely reminiscent of a similar issue that occurred with Transit previously (https://github.com/cognitect/transit-java/issues/20), but that was resolved and I'm using transit-clj "0.8.297" downstream, which has the fix.
Will try to track it down, or failing that, I'll start buying all ClojureScript contributors dual-hexacore boxes.