This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-09-26
Channels
- # arachne (4)
- # beginners (70)
- # bigdata (1)
- # boot (373)
- # braid-chat (3)
- # cider (4)
- # cljs-dev (10)
- # cljsjs (6)
- # cljsrn (27)
- # clojars (11)
- # clojure (114)
- # clojure-austria (1)
- # clojure-czech (2)
- # clojure-dusseldorf (2)
- # clojure-greece (7)
- # clojure-italy (2)
- # clojure-nl (6)
- # clojure-russia (15)
- # clojure-serbia (11)
- # clojure-spec (92)
- # clojure-uk (5)
- # clojurescript (183)
- # component (9)
- # cursive (28)
- # datomic (36)
- # editors (4)
- # emacs (1)
- # garden (11)
- # hoplon (155)
- # lein-figwheel (7)
- # mount (47)
- # om (97)
- # onyx (25)
- # proton (3)
- # rdf (3)
- # re-frame (80)
- # reagent (9)
- # ring-swagger (9)
- # spacemacs (1)
- # untangled (145)
- # vim (2)
it doesn’t seem that nonconforming
has been ported over yet
is there a ticket for that?
Rich may delete nonconforming
now that nilable
is not using it
so it might pay to be lazy on that one - note that it’s not considered a public api function (it was accidental that it was included in the doc before)
hrm, make sense
so maybe what makes sense to port over is the fix for nilable conformance, i.e. https://github.com/clojure/clojure/commit/7ff4c70b13d29cf0a1fc7f19ba53413a38bb03d5
that, for sure
I assume nonconforming isn’t there because cljs is a bit behind though with the perf changes in alpha12 so maybe there is more that needs to be done too, not sure