This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2016-07-29
Channels
- # admin-announcements (2)
- # beginners (10)
- # boot (253)
- # cider (11)
- # cljs-dev (26)
- # cljsjs (21)
- # cljsrn (7)
- # clojure (87)
- # clojure-berlin (13)
- # clojure-dusseldorf (5)
- # clojure-greece (7)
- # clojure-poland (11)
- # clojure-russia (189)
- # clojure-spec (31)
- # clojure-uk (86)
- # clojurescript (89)
- # cursive (15)
- # datavis (2)
- # datomic (57)
- # devcards (3)
- # dirac (92)
- # editors-rus (3)
- # emacs (4)
- # events (1)
- # funcool (30)
- # hoplon (3)
- # jobs-rus (6)
- # leiningen (1)
- # luminus (12)
- # mount (25)
- # off-topic (5)
- # om (43)
- # onyx (41)
- # perun (1)
- # proton (2)
- # protorepl (7)
- # re-frame (17)
- # reagent (34)
- # ring (13)
- # specter (1)
- # spirituality-ethics (1)
@anmonteiro: thanks but probably won’t look at advanced compilation issues until we ship what’s there first
@dnolen: makes sense, I expected that so I didn’t bother to create a JIRA
@dnolen: Was looking through JIRA and I think I found 2 or 3 issues that are obsolete: http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-1683 http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-1241 http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-1223
@anmonteiro: thanks for the pointers, closed those
@dnolen: just attached a patch to http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-1607
this is that specify!
bug that’s causing a bogus warning in Om under advanced compilation
I’d appreciate your review as I’m not too sure on the fix, even though I managed to produce a test that fails without the patch
@anmonteiro: k will take a look at some point today, but focusing on cljs.spec today
thanks, appreciate it
@dnolen: Has namespaced maps & symbol syntax been ported over to CLJS yet?
@anmonteiro: yes, but that’s a feature of the reader so tools.reader thing
I don’t think this one is a reader feature? http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1919
@anmonteiro: ah right, yeah happy to see that one ported
@dnolen: cool, it would be handy for a thing I’m doing now, so I’ll work on that
@anmonteiro: do you have permissions to assign it to yourself?
I think so, is there a JIRA issue already for this?
k, I’ll create one too
@dnolen: the new destructure
uses the new ident?
pred in clojure. Should we bump the Clojure dep to 1.9 or just inline (or (keyword? x) (symbol? x))
@anmonteiro: just inline it
it’s only in one place anyway
@dnolen: did you change my permissions on JIRA?
I don’t think I have the patch
field now when editing a ticket
Hah, seems like tickets of the type “Task” don’t have that field
got it now, assigned CLJS-1719 (namespaced destructuring) to you