This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2022-04-03
Channels
- # announcements (5)
- # aws (3)
- # babashka (52)
- # babashka-sci-dev (23)
- # beginners (51)
- # calva (191)
- # clj-commons (18)
- # clj-kondo (11)
- # cljdoc (39)
- # cljsrn (3)
- # clojure (24)
- # clojure-czech (3)
- # clojure-dev (2)
- # clojure-europe (15)
- # clojuredesign-podcast (2)
- # clojurescript (8)
- # conjure (2)
- # core-typed (151)
- # cursive (15)
- # data-science (3)
- # datalevin (4)
- # datomic (8)
- # figwheel-main (21)
- # fulcro (37)
- # gratitude (3)
- # honeysql (1)
- # hyperfiddle (2)
- # introduce-yourself (1)
- # malli (3)
- # membrane (54)
- # off-topic (21)
- # other-languages (4)
- # portal (18)
- # re-frame (12)
- # reagent (7)
- # releases (2)
- # sci (64)
- # scittle (1)
- # spacemacs (14)
- # sql (2)
- # vim (4)
- # xtdb (6)
I'm such a snob about these things
it's awful
I'd want to do it in clojurescript if I did do it and I know jack all about that
I am, but I really, really want to ship this first
and I have some calva stuff I'd like to finish
more projects than time, plus chronic fatigue, means I have to be really selective
I think cljdoc is pretty fluid. We have a ragtag team. So whoever takes the lead for a certain area has lots of leeway. (Which allows me do things the Lee way often!)
I adore puns, so you're cool in my book
@lee you might be interested in this https://github.com/cljdoc/cljdoc/pull/572/files#diff-2f11335bac8814e71695183f661ca9e4dae45a5d38d4de33921e41d45740c4b3
aaaaand this https://github.com/cljdoc/cljdoc/pull/572/files#diff-1cfb0088ab64466082a801132d3d3fef7540bee2cd5766216c682f219b19ba17
I'm liking malli so far
it certainly is
I realize that's a pain for reviewers
but there aren't really any good in-between steps for the feature
yeah that’s fine, we might not understand it all in detail but can certainly review the general gist of it
pretty sure I'm going to need to move this searchbox
I think it'll have to be across the top of the page now
which, tbh, I like better
I need more space to express all the relevant info about a search result
whether it's a doc or a def or an ns
a little bit of the match to show what we're matching on
one downside to flexsearch is that while its queries are the best by a long shot it doesn't return what it actually matched on so I also need to figure out how to get that
I may have to use something else tbh
Well, whatever the v0 release of single docset search will be, it is probably better than what we have now, right? I mean to say: if you want to move on to other distractions, we don’t need perfection for the first cut.
it won't be perfect but I want it to not be embarrassingly bad like it is now