Did we ever reach consensus on what cljdoc should do with a namespace that has no public vars but has an extensive ns docstring? (e.g., a namespace that provides just optional implementations of protocols)

@seancorfield, I think so? https://github.com/cljdoc/cljdoc/issues/21

Ah, yes. Thanks for refreshing my memory! It just hasn't been implemented yet. I suspect it'll soon be moot for me as I'm about to add vars to next.jdbc.date-time anyway 🙂

Other obligations have distracted me from Clojure. I do hope to get back to my happy place soon though! And if none gets to it before me, I’ll be happy to tackle that issue.