Fork me on GitHub
#cljdoc
<
2019-09-01
>
schmee18:09:46

@martinklepsch can I just say that this is the best thing ever? :dancer: no more Codox for me!

schmee18:09:53

thanks for making it! šŸ˜„

martinklepsch18:09:12

Welcome John and thanks for the nice words! :)

martinklepsch18:09:16

By now itā€™s a bunch more people than just me but itā€™s always super nice to hear peopleā€™s excitement and positive feedback so thanks for coming by and taking the time :)

schmee18:09:35

youā€™re welcome, and keep up the good work šŸ™‚

schmee19:09:45

hmm, speaking of, I just noticed that a library of mine (java-http-clj) fails to build: https://circleci.com/gh/martinklepsch/cljdoc-builder/7411#tests/containers/0

schmee19:09:52

Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: java.net.http.HttpClient, compiling:(java_http_clj/core.clj:1:1)

schmee19:09:07

what version of the JVM is the analysis run with?

schmee19:09:29

that library is built on Java 11 features so thatā€™s probably why it doesnā€™t work

schmee19:09:55

ahh, just saw that this was discussed above šŸ˜„

noprompt19:09:25

Is there a ā€œone-linerā€ for generating docs for some code in a directory? I tried following the directions and I just kept getting stack traces.

noprompt19:09:46

Since John and I are having different experiences, I figure I might ask if that is an intended use case?

noprompt19:09:08

The stack traces were really hard for me to comprehend and I just gave up after spend some time with it.

noprompt19:09:31

If its welcome, Iā€™d like to offer a patch for the command line interface that verifies some of the options passed. Iā€™m under the impression that Iā€™ve done something wrong and triggered a code path that cljdoc is not considering.

martinklepsch19:09:53

@noprompt would it be possible to open an issue and create a repro?

martinklepsch19:09:23

Also hi! šŸ‘‹ ā˜ŗļø

noprompt19:09:11

@martinklepsch Sure. Essentially what I wanted to ask about and help with was the command line arguments.

noprompt19:09:23

And, haha, howdy? šŸ‘‹ šŸ™‚

noprompt19:09:27

Iā€™m about to head out soon but Iā€™ll see if I can put together a script or something that step-by-step triggers the problem.

martinklepsch19:09:03

Definitely open to (& happy about) improvements if you see some to be made :)

martinklepsch19:09:39

Sounds good! Let us know if you get stuck. And would rather just talk things through here. All valid :)

martinklepsch20:09:30

@schmee re jdk11: what you found is the state of affairs, please leave a note in the issue that this affects you. You have an explicit invitation to +1 šŸ™ƒ

martinklepsch20:09:53

Also mention the project that is affected if possible

martinklepsch20:09:30

@mpenet which was the project that you needed jdk11 for?

borkdude21:09:34

Maybe this could be handy for cljdoc: https://gist.github.com/borkdude/a600082397bb4f81de5173fe8a19e890 Background: some project.clj use read-eval, but evaluating it isn't always safe. This offers a controlled way

borkdude21:09:08

Maybe not relevant, since cljdoc only reads the pom.xml probably anyway