This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2019-09-01
Channels
- # announcements (5)
- # beginners (151)
- # calva (4)
- # cider (32)
- # cljdoc (27)
- # cljsrn (2)
- # clojars (15)
- # clojure (66)
- # clojure-houston (2)
- # clojure-india (1)
- # clojure-italy (3)
- # clojure-uk (7)
- # clojurescript (15)
- # data-science (1)
- # datomic (2)
- # fulcro (6)
- # off-topic (24)
- # pedestal (1)
- # re-frame (20)
- # reagent (3)
- # remote-jobs (4)
- # rewrite-clj (2)
- # shadow-cljs (9)
- # spacemacs (5)
- # tools-deps (4)
- # vim (1)
- # yada (4)
@martinklepsch can I just say that this is the best thing ever? :dancer: no more Codox for me!
Welcome John and thanks for the nice words! :)
By now itās a bunch more people than just me but itās always super nice to hear peopleās excitement and positive feedback so thanks for coming by and taking the time :)
hmm, speaking of, I just noticed that a library of mine (java-http-clj) fails to build: https://circleci.com/gh/martinklepsch/cljdoc-builder/7411#tests/containers/0
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: java.net.http.HttpClient, compiling:(java_http_clj/core.clj:1:1)
Is there a āone-linerā for generating docs for some code in a directory? I tried following the directions and I just kept getting stack traces.
Since John and I are having different experiences, I figure I might ask if that is an intended use case?
The stack traces were really hard for me to comprehend and I just gave up after spend some time with it.
If its welcome, Iād like to offer a patch for the command line interface that verifies some of the options passed. Iām under the impression that Iāve done something wrong and triggered a code path that cljdoc is not considering.
@noprompt would it be possible to open an issue and create a repro?
Also hi! š āŗļø
@martinklepsch Sure. Essentially what I wanted to ask about and help with was the command line arguments.
Iām about to head out soon but Iāll see if I can put together a script or something that step-by-step triggers the problem.
Definitely open to (& happy about) improvements if you see some to be made :)
Sounds good! Let us know if you get stuck. And would rather just talk things through here. All valid :)
@schmee re jdk11: what you found is the state of affairs, please leave a note in the issue that this affects you. You have an explicit invitation to +1 š
Also mention the project that is affected if possible
@mpenet which was the project that you needed jdk11 for?
Maybe this could be handy for cljdoc: https://gist.github.com/borkdude/a600082397bb4f81de5173fe8a19e890 Background: some project.clj use read-eval, but evaluating it isn't always safe. This offers a controlled way