[intent: just chatting] [definitely off topic] I have an idea a little crazy .. there is this browser called [beaker browser](https://beakerbrowser.com/) which is good at updating and displaying offline static sites. I am wondering if in the long term it would be a good target for a fully offline user experience. However, I think that cljdoc would need a lot of changes to fit that project.

I am trying to get the project running on my computer and it runs, but there are some errors displayed in my terminal, I don't know if it is to be expected or if I have a wrong setup.

My feedback on the "get started" process for new comers: When I followed the instructions to run the server locally, I ran into a small problem where the website complained that I did not built the JS files, even if I did it already. The problem disappears after I interrupted the server and restarted it, with the js file already been built. I followed the chronological order of the documentation. Maybe I needed to build the JS files before running the server to avoid the problem.

Contribution workflow question: I found some minor typos in the project, should I point to them via comments in Github or do a PR?

> I followed the chronological order of the documentation. Maybe I needed to build the JS files before running the server to avoid the problem. Another contributor also ran into that issue. I think the problem is that resources-compiled doesn't exist when the server (or process) is started. If it's about the server then we could probably just .mkdir it before starting the server. If it's the process we should update the documentation. But generally the more independent those things are the better.

So did you restart the entire clj process or just the system?

> Contribution workflow question: I found some minor typos in the project, should I point to them via comments in Github or do a PR? (edited) PR is easier to integrate, also happy to give you commit access if you're worries about to many PRs creating noise