This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2018-09-24
Channels
- # 100-days-of-code (7)
- # announcements (1)
- # bangalore-clj (1)
- # beginners (87)
- # boot (6)
- # cljdoc (16)
- # cljsrn (13)
- # clojure (32)
- # clojure-dev (30)
- # clojure-italy (18)
- # clojure-nl (4)
- # clojure-serbia (1)
- # clojure-uk (48)
- # clojurescript (18)
- # cursive (18)
- # datascript (1)
- # datomic (7)
- # events (9)
- # figwheel-main (28)
- # fulcro (2)
- # hyperfiddle (2)
- # immutant (8)
- # jobs (16)
- # liberator (4)
- # nyc (2)
- # pedestal (15)
- # re-frame (8)
- # reagent (12)
- # reitit (8)
- # remote-jobs (1)
- # ring-swagger (2)
- # robots (1)
- # rum (1)
- # schema (1)
- # shadow-cljs (45)
- # spacemacs (49)
- # sql (13)
- # tools-deps (59)
- # uncomplicate (1)
- # vim (10)
@justalanm thanks for stopping by 👋 I’m not on a computer right now but generally this kind of issue should only occur if - the artifact has a typo somewhere (name, version) - the artifact is in a specific repo that is not part of the default maven repositories defined by tools.deps
For debugging it might help to see if things work locally by running ./script/cljdoc ingest
from the cljdoc repo as described here: https://github.com/cljdoc/cljdoc/blob/master/doc/running-cljdoc-locally.md
And if you’re lucky maybe other people around here will look into it too :)
Thanks @martinklepsch, for as much as I know the package is in Maven Centralhttps://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/ml/dmlc/xgboost-jvm/, I can try to bump its version tonight and see what happens
@justalanm also try if you can depend on it using the new deps.edn stuff
It seems that the jars for 0.72 only have the -javadoc
classifier (I.e. no regular jar) and I’m not sure how tools.deps deals with that /cc @dominicm
Asked in #tools-deps as well
The reason I said I'll bump the version is because I found this https://github.com/dmlc/xgboost/pull/3401 which is pretty recent and I'm guessing they're providing prebuilt jars only for 0.8
@justalanm I think the same issue will apply to 0.8 — or at least the contents of the maven repo look very similar to 0.72
Yeah I just checked and I require it like this [ml.dmlc/xgboost-jvm "0.72" :extension "pom"], the same goes for 0.8
Yeah that’s probably getting lost when constructing the class path for analysis. Will also need to check if tools deps supports the extension stuff. Feel free to create an issue for this.
I don't suppose there are plans in the works to create a cljdoc.main for use with the clojure
command-line tool?