This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-07-26
Channels
- # announcements (6)
- # beginners (69)
- # calva (10)
- # clj-kondo (9)
- # clojure (32)
- # clojure-uk (9)
- # clojuredesign-podcast (13)
- # clojurescript (14)
- # clojureverse-ops (2)
- # conjure (24)
- # cursive (12)
- # data-science (1)
- # datomic (13)
- # graalvm (5)
- # jobs-discuss (4)
- # malli (6)
- # meander (33)
- # off-topic (9)
- # pedestal (2)
- # re-frame (38)
- # reitit (6)
- # rum (4)
- # shadow-cljs (6)
- # tools-deps (8)
- # xtdb (26)
Hey @borkdude, I really like clj-kondo
work and I think it's better than clojure-lsp
in parse/lint.
I thinking if it worth/would be better for clojure-lsp
use the option 1 from here: https://github.com/snoe/clojure-lsp/issues/66, I could help @snoe with that
@ericdallo You mean option 1 from this comment? https://github.com/snoe/clojure-lsp/issues/66#issuecomment-587406393
Yeah, I think clj-kondo
has evolved a lot since the creation of this issue, and maybe we can think in some integration where user can opt-in/out from clj-kondo
if we want
@cnly's branch looks promissing and It seems we almost resolved that issue, I think the issue got lost for some reason, but I asked it again: https://github.com/snoe/clojure-lsp/issues/66#issuecomment-664042668
@ericdallo I replied in the issue