This page is not created by, affiliated with, or supported by Slack Technologies, Inc.
2020-03-06
Channels
- # announcements (1)
- # aws (36)
- # babashka (105)
- # beginners (53)
- # calva (27)
- # cider (5)
- # clj-kondo (10)
- # clojure (232)
- # clojure-europe (4)
- # clojure-italy (6)
- # clojure-losangeles (9)
- # clojure-nl (3)
- # clojure-sanfrancisco (3)
- # clojure-uk (124)
- # clojured (3)
- # clojurescript (57)
- # clojutre (1)
- # core-async (9)
- # core-logic (1)
- # cryogen (23)
- # cursive (35)
- # datomic (12)
- # duct (4)
- # events (1)
- # figwheel-main (3)
- # fulcro (9)
- # graalvm (31)
- # jobs (1)
- # jobs-discuss (85)
- # kaocha (11)
- # leiningen (11)
- # luminus (19)
- # malli (47)
- # meander (12)
- # nrepl (8)
- # off-topic (32)
- # pathom (4)
- # pedestal (2)
- # reagent (7)
- # ring-swagger (1)
- # schema (3)
- # sql (5)
- # tools-deps (114)
- # vim (17)
- # xtdb (12)
Hi, me again. I've found a false positive pair in unused binding field and unresolved symbol field with this:
(defn foo [k {v k}] v)
(foo :a {:a 1}) ;; -> 1
If you think this is supported by Clojure (and not just accidental behavior) talk to Alex Miller or anyone else from the core team. If they think it should be supported as official Clojure, I would be happy to fix it.
I pasted this convo over there now: https://github.com/borkdude/clj-kondo/issues/782#issuecomment-595835968 In case anyone else searches for it.
💯 4