General Q about copyright/licensing for libraries that move under the clj-commons banner: durable-queue says:
### license
Copyright © 2015 Factual Inc
Distributed under the Eclipse Public License 1.0
If "we" start working on such a library in substantive ways, is there a policy about updating the copyright?Good question. Dunno. I just leave them as is, untouched.
you could email or ping zach tellman on twitter about it. he's fairly responsive to questions
What's Twitter? 🤣
If you have to X, you don't know.
Reports of defstruct's obsolescence are exaggerated. If you know the fields when you are writing the program, then defrecord is more appropriate. If the fields cannot be known until runtime, then defstruct can be reasonable.
(wrong thread i think)
All PRs for durable-queue have been closed -- mostly integrated into the master branch -- and the latest git version is prepped for an 0.2.0 release once I've reviewed the outstanding issues and had a think about a few things. Note that 0.2.0 will deprecate the single-segment namespace (but keep it as undocumented), although all changes have been applied to both that and the new clj-commons.durable-queue ns.