Clojurians Log v2

@danielcompton any thoughts on @hlship’s comments about clarifying governance>

This page https://clj-commons.org/ lists Daniel, Erik, and Sean (me) as the three people "who are involved" and the meta readme lists entry criteria etc and the governance page doesn't really add much as it stands (to me). It feels like readme should talk more about clj-commons governance (what Howard thinks is missing) and some parts of the current readme could move to project governance (particularly the artifact coordinates piece)?

Also, @slipset when you're on deck Wednesday, if you have opinions?

I have no strong feelings, either way. I haven’t put much thought into what’s where, I must admit.

https://github.com/clj-commons/meta/issues/73 -- anyone know how to contact Zach or what they're up to?

I reviewed the open issues on the meta repo -- I closed one and added comments to several that probably could be closed. There's a documentation one that plays into the discussion above so I'll take that on and try to get at least a proposal in place in the next week or so.

https://github.com/clj-commons/meta/issues/69 is awaiting more "votes" but I think it is non-controversial.

I cleaned up a bunch of issues so there are just three open now: https://github.com/clj-commons/meta/issues

🙏