I'm going to talk with Leon about claypool tomorrow in a call. Anything you want to ask him? From what I got so far: • he does not code Clojure these days and claypool is kind of "done" . • I can maintain the codebase going forward and I asked him for some help during the transition • He will be available for PR reviews and such in the near future • I think we should release the new version using a new group id: What is the preference between claypool/claypool or clj-commons/claypool or .... ?
I'd say clj-commons/claypool, this is the easiest option regarding deploy tokens etc, unless we have full control over the claypool org in clojars
thanks, I think we will go with clj-commons/claypool
It has to be org.clj-commons/claypool, because clojars
yeah ok